Of note here is Bavaria, who would have a masonic king shortly after that country outlawed the Illuminati, whose stated goal was to infiltrate freemasonry, and which they had already achieved by that point. In other words, outlawing the Illuminati was completely unsuccessful (as other documents prove as well). They only gained more power to the point that one of their people ruled the country.
Also of note is that probably a lot of these kings are way from way before freemasonry went public in 1717. There's no doubt that freemasonry is older than that date as the term appears in print in the 1630s already, but I always had the impression that it was obscure back then and yet to gain power, not that fucking kings were masons.
Thirdly I will note that a lot of these don't list a source so they need to be double-checked.
Log in
Of note here is Bavaria, who would have a masonic king shortly after that country outlawed the Illuminati, whose stated goal was to infiltrate freemasonry, and which they had already achieved by that point. In other words, outlawing the Illuminati was completely unsuccessful (as other documents prove as well). They only gained more power to the point that one of their people ruled the country.
Also of note is that probably a lot of these kings are way from way before freemasonry went public in 1717. There's no doubt that freemasonry is older than that date as the term appears in print in the 1630s already, but I always had the impression that it was obscure back then and yet to gain power, not that fucking kings were masons.
Thirdly I will note that a lot of these don't list a source so they need to be double-checked.
@JasonCarswell @Tom_Bombadil @soundsituation
But... Its da jooz