I've made a math game we could play. We'll see how it goes.

Atop a mountain live a hand full of omnivoric tigers. And this mountain is capped by the greenest grass you've ever seen. One day a cursed sheep appears on the mountain. There is something peculiar about this sheep. For one it is made of meat. But for two anyone who eats this sheep also becomes a cursed sheep. It is impossible for a tiger to share a meal of sheep.

Now the tigers are named @x0x7, @LarrySwinger, @JasonCarswell, @Tom_Bombadil. They number four in total unless someone shows up really fast. Their sole interest in life is to live or die with as much money as possible.

Now all the tigers had put money into a pool to make things interesting. Anyone who eats a sheep will get a share of this pool. And the pool starts at $100. But if a tiger dies in any way he must put $100 more into the pool for being a suka who died. The tigers all assume each one is perfectly rational.

If you look up this math problem there is a simple solution but I want to gamify it by adding one extra dimension.

Tigers can also just straight up kill each other. Any tiger with a power level +30 over another tiger can kill that tiger but must pay off any tigers living at the time of the murder with $25 each.

I've done the math and it will be more fun with more tigers. So everyone gets two. We'll say they want to maximize household net worth.

It is worth seeing what's going on with a version where we each only have one, so consider what people would do if this were the setup:

PWR	Tiger
18	@x0x7{1}
19	@JasonCarswell{1}
68	@Tom_Bombadil{1}
76	@LarrySwinger{1}

Two tiger variant

PWR	Tiger
14	@x0x7{1}
18	@x0x7{2}
19	@JasonCarswell{1}
37	@LarrySwinger{1}
42	@Tom_Bombadil{1}
43	@JasonCarswell{2}
68	@Tom_Bombadil{2}
76	@LarrySwinger{2}

Let's play the 1 tiger version first. If I can get even one more person to show up that version should be good enough. Nest your moves down a comment tree so we can know the move order.