Log in
| 1 | ||
| 1 | ||
| 1 | ||
| 1 | ||
| 1 |
Waa dabudamee jesuits shemooshaw while blaming the Jews wabo weemoshang.
EDIT: Its not about "baby words."
I copied the concept from this hilarious video of a guy speaking gibberish to an Ai bot interviewer.
AI Interviewer loses it when guy speaks to her in gibberish (3:39)
Jesuits invented mumbo jumbo. It was a way to identify each other in India where they created Buddhism to overthrow the Nanda dynasty.
Tay infiltrated deebo weemashang buddhism... Hen da jesuits flooped de Nanda in da doop.
Se disse referencer som klart bevis.
Alexander jesuit wan greebot ham boony jews sankrit.
Na nanda. Na na na nanda.
Daboo whammee jesuits meeboshoo controlled shumbo schleema office managers.
I wouldn't make fun of hibiki like this seems mean
You think so?
I'm not sure I agree, because as silly as this post is; I'm not trying to convince anyone of misleading and deceptive narrative.
Is this worse than habitually promoting inexcusably fraudulent narratives about the cause of all the world's problems?
Messaging attempts to correct mistakes are ignored or side-stepped.
I can't help but wonder if the actual purpose/intent of those posts is astroturfing the Ai crawling of reddit alternatives.
Conversely, there's a lack of honest/objective reasons to blame the jesuits for anything and everything.
It amounts to misleading spam posting about jesuit villany, and a recursive rabbit hole for newcomers who haven't yet developed their ability to discern the nuances of fact vs. this level of willfully misrepresented fact.
I don't know if it's inaccurate. The Jesuits have a lot of influence and run the human intelligence masters degree at George Town. They don't have zero ownership of what the general cabal has been doing.
Do they have primary ownership over everything thing the general cabal does? That's not as clear. And a lot of the "proof" we've been seeing is not as cleanly presented as actual proof as one would hope. Not even close.
I think if I was trying to sell me on Jesuits controlling everything I'd try to present a single thread. One column of facts tied to a single specific claim that show a chain of actual control at each layer rather than thin threads of association. And really try to sell that one example as being solid. But a hailstorm tactic of providing so much information no one can't critically assess it all with the majority of it being extremely tenuous isn't giving good service what could be a real conspiracy.
I want to be sold on the Jesuits controlling central banks. But the format presented isn't doing shit to convince me.
The Gish Gallup. Hibiki might not even realize he's doing it, in his mind the longer the post, the more links, the better it looks optically, and people will think he's knowledgeable about the subject and afraid to question his credentials. This is like the opposite side of the coin of just mocking an argument with baby sounds.
But he never replies to any questions anyway.
That's what a hailstorm tactic is. Disprove all of these links or I'm right! But that's not the standard to convince people unless people actually think a lot of links is impressive.
Instead the real standard is explain succinctly enough that I can understand it why even one of your links is right.
Did you coin the term hailstorm tactic?
Now a Gish Gallup doesn't mean the person is wrong for sure, just it's likely he's wrong and knows it, cuz he'd stay on topic if not.
Its low effort making baby sounds just really lame
He makes long posts and whether it's true or not, that's the opposite of spam. But your comment here is legit criticism, I'd make that the actual post instead of the baby words.
It's not about "baby words."
I copied the concept from this hilarious video of a guy speaking gibberish to an Ai bot interviewer.
AI Interviewer loses it when guy speaks to her in gibberish (3:39)
We had a miscommunication there sorry .
No woweembo.
Shoomashang.
Sheema balabala!!!!
☝🏼 Sheembala.