Log in
| 1 | ||
| 1 | ||
| 1 | ||
| 1 | ||
| 1 |
We may first acknowledge Jesuit evil actions plagued humanity for centuries. This intelligent forum will know that.
Fundamentally, to remove all presuppositions and beliefs in false "truths", the answers must be clear, concise, compelling, self-evident, and preferably irrefutable - otherwise they waste time.
1 - Why does it matter what label(s) or name(s) or term(s) we give the ruling class consisting of various banksters, cabals, factions, families, FIC-MIC-TIC, globalists, NGOs, WASPs, Zionists, etc. - AKA, a pluralism of major influences? (Sometimes, and often, these groups find alignment. The Rhodes circles within circles overlap like Venn diagrams.)
2A - How can we be sure the Jesuits are at the top?
2B - How can we be sure the Jesuits have maintained their top position?
2C - How can we be sure the Jesuits are alone at the top, not sharing the top?
3 - How can we be sure the Jesuits are responsible for all of the biggest conflicts of the last 500 years, not just some of them.
4A - What distinguishes the Jesuits from other groups?
4B - How are their actions different?
4C - How are their ideas different?
4D - How are their ethics and morals different?
4E - How do these distinctions make any difference to humanity?
5A - Most people don't have time to research all the things. So what are the top 5 (not more) documentaries on the Jesuits?
5B - Of the 5 documentaries, what are the key angles of analysis for each?
6 - Why should we care enough to investigate further?
7 - How can we be sure this isn't a psy-op to distract us from the actual levers of power?
8 - How can we be sure we're correct?
9 - What important question(s) were missed?
These questions presuppose objectivity and factual accuracy.
However...
The example cited above amounts to a tabloid headline, as the factual assumptions are incorrect, and false conclusions are baked into the title.
The suggestions you have proposed have merit, but they mistakenly assume the author has an interest in accurately presenting the facts.
We can try. If the answers don't meet those criteria, they may at least clarify and/or lead to something of value - possibly that there's nothing much further to discuss.
Agreed. Blanket accusations without substance. You might as well believe all the official stories or be a MAGAtard falling for every Trump lie.
The screenwriting phrase, "show don't tell," comes to mind. Characters saying how great the hero is fails hard, whereas if the hero performs great acts it doesn't have to be said.
It's not a mistake. The absence of good answers speak volumes about the quality of the claims - much like socks could never defend their blind faith in authority, blind faith in corporate media, etc.
Are you proposing a final solution to the jesuit question?
You read my mind. I tried to use or imply that phrase in the title, but found it awkward, distracting, and wasted time/energy.
This is the final Hibiki solution.
Although, "The final solution to the jesuit question" is Hilarious.
You deserve full credit for conceptualization.
The elegant concept inversion reveals the ridiculous jesuit diversion.
I wish I had thought of it.
I wish he'd show up to teach me something besides bold statements I'm supposed to take at face value. I actually want to learn more about the Jesuits, as well as other groups (Club Of Rome, etc.). We're all busy, so few of us will seek it out, much less deep dive, unless it's presented well.
Sure he's got lots of sources. Are they good? Are they old or new? Are they written by Zionists, bought-out, and/or Jesuit-enemies? Are they rooted in truth? Are they deep in truth?
He doesn't even have a good pitch much less any narrative to string along.
His certainty is the biggest red flag.
If he can't reach us, or anyone, he's wasting his time.
It seems like a strategy of muddying the waters.
For a short while he was posting about both jews and jesuits. But mostly jesuits. Maybe at a 10:1 ratio, or something.
No one is pretending the black pope and his Gang are innocent. Maybe they're playing a better game of multidimensional x-checkers on the tesserated tiles.
HibikiCatfish
I like x0x7's phrasings, these groups find alignment in a pluralism of major influences.
☝🏼
I agree that it is better implied in the title.
Professional victims prey on similar stereotyping.
The tag team bounce 'em off the ropes; followed by the final leaping lariat solution.
Truth in comedy.
2A: So, prior to the collapse of society, it was generally accepted that even before the Jesuits were a thing, the Vatican ran usury. In fact prior to them even existing, the Vatican was already using the Jews as scapegoats, blaming them for the usury and degeneracy, and this eventually starts the Protestant reformation in which the Jesuits were recognized in a popular way as the most malicious group. There's simply no reason why to believe the Protestants were being cunning or malicious since they were mostly good guys despite their flaws and post Protestant reformation, the biggest conflicts, WWI, WWII and the Bolshevik revolution, in all of these events I've througly recorded how the Jesuits were involved in these events and exaggerated the Jewish influence as well.
2B) The only thing the Jesuits have done post WWII and the major conflicts in continue to consolidate power. Allen Dulles, Knight of Malta Joseph P Kennedy and the Rockefellers were all involved in helping the German National Socialist regime. Post WWII, Allen Dulles helps a lot of Germans get away and together they help creating the CIA. Reinhard Gehlen helps setting up the Mossad and since the Jesuits were so influential in setting up the original National Socialist movement, it's obvious that the modern neo-nazi movement run by the intel groups nowadays is an extension of them for the most part. Basically during the Protestant reformation, we know for a fact that the Jesuits were the strongest group, post this, I recorded how during the major conflicts they had a major role, and post WWII and all that all I see is the Jesuits growing more powerful and setting up their tentacles everywhere. See An analysis of Jesuit raw wealth and institutional power structure.
2C) I don't think the Jesuits are downright alone at the top but simply are significantly more powerful than anything else. In fact, considering the Catholic civil war that's going on at the US at least right now, between the Republicans and Democrats, It's safe to say that the strongest opponent the Jesuits have right now is the Jesuits themselves.
4A) A complete philosophical extremism, to the point that they can leave their humanity behind completely. Curiously I wouldn't say that they are heartless either, overall a lot of Jesuits think they are doing their crimes for a good cause. I suppose that ironically makes them different when compared to other malicious groups.
4B) I wouldn't say they are all really that special either, they are just the usual extremist group thinking they are doing things bad things for a good cause they were just very successful when compared to others I guess.
4C) Rather than being usual deceivers that hide their ill intentions behind a mask, the Jesuits legit believe they are doing things for a good cause, but that's what makes them so dangerous because they can't be reasoned out of their extremism.
4D) They have a legit faith in God and think they are doing things for a greater cause but that makes them very dangerous, I suppose. It gives them a philosophical moral superiority, or at least a fake one that makes them believe they are above everyone else morally and can do terrible things for a greater cause.
4E) I suppose it makes them very scary to the common folk because they usually can't be reasoned with out of their extremism.
5.11: Occupied by Rome from Drake Shelton.
5.12: New York's War against the United States by Drake Shelton too.
5.13: Freemasonry Demystified by Veritas__Aequitas.
5.14: Vatican Secret Societies Jesuits and the New World Order. by Bryan Denlinger.
5.15 Tammany Hall's Victory Over Fabian Socialism by Drake Shelton.
5B) Occupied by Rome talks about the Jesuit and Catholic extremist takeover of the US after the Protestant groups lose a lot of territory.
New York's War Against the United States talks a lot about the organization of these groups within the United States and some of their malicious operations.
Freemasonry Demystified talks about the influence the Jesuits and the Vatican have had over freemasonry.
Vatican Secret Societies Jesuits and the New World Order talks about the role the Jesuits had in different conflicts and world events.
Tammany Hall's Victory Over Fabian Socialism talks about the Jesuit influence on the US through Tammany Hall and how after their takeover communism becomes a second issue when compared to their papal power.
I suppose that the more familiar you are with who is in control and at the top the easier it will be for you to not be fooled by their tactics. For example, I think that recently, what the Jesuits will set up is a sophisticated psyop through an alien hoax. So obviously the Jesuits are extremists that aren't quite satisfied not even with the Vatican's current traditionalist position. What they are planning to do is to set up a massive Alien Hoax, and sell people the idea that the Aliens are demons and the strange entities of the bible. There will be good and evil aliens. Maybe they will sell people the idea that the Jews are the evil aliens or reptilians (?) I don't know and this will cause everyone to support the Pope who will act as a mediator with the supposed good aliens. I'm sure even conspiracists will be fooled by this psyop since it will validate a lot of their theories, like the supposed Alien conspiracy theories which are all fake or the anti-Semitic ones to some degree and give the Jesuits even more political and religious power than what they already have. If people were familiar with the Jesuits they wouldn't be fooled by this kind of stuff, but since they are ignorant then they can't be helped...
I gave you a very well documented historical record so there's simply no reason why to doubt our current reasoning. I get the idea of being skeptical of things but never being sure of your reasoning whatsoever simply becomes nihilism at that point.
Through rationalism, there's no reason why to think we are mistaken with this historical point of view. The timeline is downright simple: The people in the white nations suffer under the Vatican. The Protestant reformation happens, the white nations reach their prime and the people are happy. The Jews and the Jesuits act as subversives and people reject them but see the Jesuits as the top dogs. Post Protestant reformation, I've documented how the Jesuits were behind all the major conflicts and exaggerated the Jewish influence. So if they are both involved, then the Jesuits should still be the leading group outside of any other fringe or malicious group that is also involved or whatever. The historical record isn't really hard to understand in the end.