We've learned many times and more recently with the Epstein files that Israel, Rothschilds, Morgans, and other wealthy assholes and have been controlling much of US politics since the 1980s. It's essential to follow the money.
Was Iran attacked because of nuclear weapons? No, they're at least 10 years away from that capability, as experts repeat often, and the bombings have changed nothing related to nuclear capability.
Was Iran attacked because of an attempt at regime change? No, because almost anyone could know that Iran has been prepared for this for over 40 years, and have had in place plans for appointing other leaders, as they'll do soon. Trump has lied about that, which is his job as errand boy.
Was Iran attacked because of the October 7 attack and support for Hamas, as some have said? No, because Iran's support for any group that fights Israel extends back decades and is arguably not necessarily a significant level of support for those many groups in the middle east.
Was Iran attached because - as Netanyahu has said - he has wanted this for over 40 years? No, because Netanyahu still depended on the US to agree to go to war.
Was Iran attacked as a distraction from the Epstein files? No, because plans to go to war with Iran date back over 40 years and could have happened any time beforehand or afterward, and the war has not necessarily distracted from the Epstein files.
[Edit: Hegeseth said a moment ago that Iran was going to attack the US. Were they? Pentagon responded by saying that Iran was not about to attack the US. Hegeseth also said the US did not start the war. Israel and the US absolutely started the war.]
Was Iran attacked because of an ongoing agreement between the US, Israel and wealthy assholes to make $billions from the military industrial complexes of several countries, while destabilizing the middle east and murdering millions? Yes.
As I often write, Trump is an errand boy.
We've learned many times and more recently with the Epstein files that Israel, Rothschilds, Morgans, and other wealthy assholes and have been controlling much of US politics since the 1980s. It's essential to follow the money.
Was Iran attacked because of nuclear weapons? No, they're at least 10 years away from that capability, as experts repeat often, and the bombings have changed nothing related to nuclear capability.
Was Iran attacked because of an attempt at regime change? No, because almost anyone could know that Iran has been prepared for this for over 40 years, and have had in place plans for appointing other leaders, as they'll do soon. Trump has lied about that, which is his job as errand boy.
Was Iran attacked because of the October 7 attack and support for Hamas, as some have said? No, because Iran's support for any group that fights Israel extends back decades and is arguably not necessarily a significant level of support for those many groups in the middle east.
Was Iran attached because - as Netanyahu has said - he has wanted this for over 40 years? No, because Netanyahu still depended on the US to agree to go to war.
Was Iran attacked as a distraction from the Epstein files? No, because plans to go to war with Iran date back over 40 years and could have happened any time beforehand or afterward, and the war has not necessarily distracted from the Epstein files.
[Edit: Hegeseth said a moment ago that Iran was going to attack the US. Were they? Pentagon responded by saying that Iran was not about to attack the US. Hegeseth also said the US did not start the war. Israel and the US absolutely started the war.]
Was Iran attacked because of an ongoing agreement between the US, Israel and wealthy assholes to make $billions from the military industrial complexes of several countries, while destabilizing the middle east and murdering millions? Yes.
Also lied about epstein files. Related?
archive.today mirror